Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOLLEN, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by JACKMAN, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Regression Diagnostics

An Expository Treatment of Outliers and Influential Cases

KENNETH A. BOLLEN

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

ROBERT W. JACKMAN

Michigan State University

Gauging the robustness of regression estimates is especially important in small-sample analyses. Here, we examine recent developments in the detection and analysis of outliers and influential cases in multivariate studies. Specifically, we review five diagnostic procedures: partial regression plots, the "hat" matrix, studentized residuals, DFITSi, and DFBETASij. The main part of the article presents two empirical applications (drawn from recent cross-national studies) that show (a) how the diagnostic procedures can be incorporated into the research process, and (b) what we can learn from them. These applications serve to underscore the point that the diagnostics cannot be employed mechanically. Instead, once a case is diagnosed as influential, remedial action requires a firm substantive grounding. Although case deletion may be warranted in some circumstances, it is an extreme remedy of last resort that should not be routinely followed. The more fruitful approach is to ask why a given case is influential. As our applications indicate, the diagnostics can be helpful in isolating such problems as sample composition, specification error, and errors in measurement.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 510-542 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124185013004004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
K. Jaskyte and W. W. Dressler
Studying Culture as an Integral Aggregate Variable: Organizational Culture and Innovation in a Group of Nonprofit Organizations
Field Methods, August 1, 2004; 16(3): 265 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
S.-Y. Lee and L. Xu
Case-Deletion Diagnostics for Factor Analysis Models With Continuous and Ordinal Categorical Data
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2003; 31(3): 389 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
L. GRIFFIN and C. C. RAGIN
Some Observations on Formal Methods of Qualitative Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1994; 23(1): 4 - 21.