This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McCLENDON, M. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys

University of Akron

Split-ballot experiments for three sets of items measuring attitudes towards lawyers, anomia, and self-esteem were included in a telephone survey to test for both acquiescence and response-order effects. The experimental design also investigated whether these response effects would be reduced by giving respondents an explicit opportunity to say "don't know" (a filtered question form). Extensive evidence for both acquiescence and recency response-order effects was found. These response effects also often occurred for the same item. Thus the use of a forced-choice form to avoid acquiescence to agree-disagree items may often substitute one type of response effect (recency order effects) for another (agreeing-response bias). Furthermore, there was very little evidence that the use of a filtered-question form would reduce these response effects. In addition to these practical conclusions, the patterns of these response effects across the three different types of attitudes, as well as their relationships to education and income, have important theoretical implications. Lack of item-specific expertise, for example, may be a more important cause of acquiescence and recency effects than low cognitive sophistication.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, 60-103 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124191020001003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Billiet and E. Davidov Testing the Stability of an Acquiescence Style Factor Behind Two Interrelated Substantive Variables in a Panel Design Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2008; 36(4): 542 - 562. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. McCLENDON and D. F. ALWIN No-Opinion Filters and Attitude Measurement Reliability Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 1993; 21(4): 438 - 464. [Abstract]

				D. WATSON Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale: An Application to Class Consciousness Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1992; 21(1): 52 - 88. [Abstract]

				D. F. ALWIN Research on Survey Quality Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1991; 20(1): 3 - 29. [Abstract]