Sociological Methods & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AMENTA, E.
Right arrow Articles by POULSEN, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 22-53 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124194023001002

Where to Begin

A Survey of Five Approaches to Selecting Independent Variables for Qualitative Comparative Analysis

EDWIN AMENTA

New York University

JANE D. POULSEN

New York University

The problem of selecting independent variables for qualitiative comparative analysis (QCA) is addressed. This is a different problem for QCA than for inferential statistical methods, for both technical and epistemological reasons. Technically, QCA can manipulate only a few variables at one time. Epistemologically, QCA expects causation to work in a combinatorial fashion. The authors isolate and reject four ways of choosing independent variables for QCA and advocate a fifth method, the conjunctural theories approach, which is more compatible with the characteristics of QCA. Their decision is supported by way of discussion and an empirical analysis based on theories of the welfare state and U.S. social spending in the Great Depression.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
N. Caren and A. Panofsky
TQCA: A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 2005; 34(2): 147 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
G. Goertz and J. Mahoney
Two-Level Theories and Fuzzy-Set Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2005; 33(4): 497 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J. MAHONEY
Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2000; 28(4): 387 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]