This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by HICKS, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction

The Case of the Emergence of the Social Security State

Emory University

This article bridges two research traditions, analytical induction (AI) and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in the context of a study of early welfare state formation. First, the article differentiates classical AI from neoanalytical induction (NAI), tracing the latter to the former and identifying some problems with NAI. Next, it outlines QCA and identifies some problems with it. Third, it sketches two bridges, along with solutions that they offer for some limitations of NAI and QCA. One bridge links NAI's method, in essence a logical implementation of the idea of the working hypothesis, to QCA's powerful Boolean technology. The second bridge joins AI's stress on the reformulation of hypotheses in the face of negative evidence to QCA's capacities for complex inductive and logical specifications of the relations of explanatory to dependent variables. Following that, the article summarizes portions of a study of early 20th-century welfare state formation and uses them to illustrate the bridges. It concludes with a discussion of the analytical promise of a variant of QCA that stresses theory building in the AI tradition.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hodson A Meta-Analysis of Workplace Ethnographies: Race, Gender, and Employee Attitudes and Behaviors Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2004; 33(1): 4 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. BOSWELL and C. BROWN The Scope of General Theory: Methods for Linking Deductive and Inductive Comparative History Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 1999; 28(2): 154 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. STRYKER Beyond History Versus Theory: Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 1996; 24(3): 304 - 352. [Abstract]