Sociological Methods & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STRYKER, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 304-352 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124196024003003

Beyond History Versus Theory

Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation

ROBIN STRYKER

University of Iowa

Strategic narrative is a useful frame for the history-theory relationship in qualitative, historical research. It suggests that some stories and ways of constructing stories will promote theory building more than will others, enabling historical sociologists to help cumulate knowledge more effectively. Four aspects of strategic narrative are discussed and illustrated: (a) concurrent construction and mutual adjustment of history and theory, with each defined and built with reference to the other; (b) selection and construction of history in response to a clearly developed abstract, general theoretical backdrop, with attention to how that backdrop conditions building of history; (c) construction of a theoretical and historical anomaly as the starting point for a phased-in comparative research design, with each phase building narratives and comparisons around key events to answer specific theoretical questions, and all phases cumulating to respond to the full range of general theoretical issues motivating the design; and (d) formulation of clear, precise concepts, measures, and coding techniques to build history as both path-dependent action sequence and complex institutional and cultural context/conjuncture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
C. Paul
US Presidential War Powers: Legacy Chains in Military Intervention Decisionmaking
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2008; 45(5): 665 - 679.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
N. Pedriana
Rational Choice, Structural Context, and Increasing Returns: A Strategy for Analytic Narrative in Historical Sociology
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2005; 33(3): 349 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J. MAHONEY
Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2000; 28(4): 387 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]