This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DE LEEUW, E. D. Articles by HOX, J. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Influence of Data Collection Method on Structural Models

A Comparison of a Mail, a Telephone, and a Face-to-Face Survey

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

GIDEON J. MELLENBERGH

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

JOOP J. HOX

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

In survey data, four potential sources of measurement error can jeopardize the results: the respondents, the interviewers, the questions, and the data collection method. In the past two decades, a shift has occurred in the way survey data are collected; telephone surveys and, to a lesser degree, mail surveys are now more extensively used. This has stimulated empirical research on the influence of the data collection method on data quality. Most of these mode comparisons used univariate criteria. In this study we concentrate on the potential influence of the data collection method on two substantive structural models. A controlled field experiment was conducted in which a mail, a telephone, and a face-to-face survey were compared. Using multigroup comparisons, two substantive structural equation models (one for loneliness and one for general well-being) were compared across the different data collection methods. The different data collection methods turned out to produce significantly different covariance matrices. Subsequent analyses showed that structural models, based on these covariance matrices, also differed.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 443-472 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124196024004002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Best, B. Krueger, C. Hubbard, and A. Smith An Assessment of the Generalizability of Internet Surveys Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2001; 19(2): 131 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Grube Monitoring Youth Behavior in Response To Structural Changes: Alternative Approaches for Measuring Adolescent Drinking Eval Rev, April 1, 1997; 21(2): 231 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]