Sociological Methods & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGEHEINE, R.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DE POL, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 492-516 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124196024004004

Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Categorical Data Analysis

ROLF LANGEHEINE

University of Kiel, Germany

JEROEN PANNEKOEK

Statistics Netherlands

FRANK VAN DE POL

Statistics Netherlands

When sparse data have to be fitted to a log-linear or latent class model, one cannot use the theoretical chi-square distribution to evaluate model fit, because with sparse data the observed cross-table has too many cells in relation to the number of observations to use a distribution that only holds asymptotically. The choice of a theoretical distribution is also difficult when model-expected frequencies are 0 or when model probabilities are estimated 0 or 1. The authors propose to solve these problems by estimating the distribution of a fit measure, using bootstrap methods. An algorithm is presented for estimating this distribution by drawing bootstrap samples from the model-expected proportions, the so-called nonnaive bootstrap method. For the first time the method is applied to empirical data of varying sparseness, from five different data sets. Results show that the asymptotic chi-square distribution is not at all valid for sparse data.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
C. H. Elzinga, A. W. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra
Linked Markov Sources: Modeling Outcome-Dependent Social Processes
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2007; 36(1): 26 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. M. Dunn, K. Jordan, and P. R. Croft
Characterizing the Course of Low Back Pain: A Latent Class Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2006; 163(8): 754 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. G. Waller
LCA 1.1: An R Package for Exploratory Latent Class Analysis
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2004; 28(2): 141 - 142.
[PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. J. Croudace, M.-R. Jarvelin, M. E. J. Wadsworth, and P. B. Jones
Developmental Typology of Trajectories to Nighttime Bladder Control: Epidemiologic Application of Longitudinal Latent Class Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2003; 157(9): 834 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
F. BASSI, J. A. HAGENAARS, M. A. CROON, and J. K. VERMUNT
Estimating True Changes when Categorical Panel Data are Affected by Uncorrelated and Correlated Classification Errors: An Application to Unemployment Data
Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 2000; 29(2): 230 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Chan, Y.-F. Yung, P. M. Bentler, and M.-L. Tang
Tests of Independence for Ordinal Data Using Bootstrap
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1998; 58(2): 221 - 240.
[Abstract]