Sociological Methods & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FITZMAURICE, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDTHORPE, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, 267-283 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124197025003001

Adjusting for Overdispersion in an Analysis of Comparative Social Mobility

GARRETT M. FITZMAURICE

Nuffield College, Oxford University

JOHN H. GOLDTHORPE

Nuffield College, Oxford University

The authors discuss the problem of overdispersion in large-scale data sets and its potential impact on standard model selection strategies. Overdispersion is considered to be present when the data display more variability than is predicted by the assumed sampling model. In a recent cross-national analysis of social mobility, data were combined from nine national studies that employed somewhat different sampling schemes and related data collection procedures. Ignoring these features of the data is quite likely to introduce excess dispersion. Typically, the presence of overdispersion can be due to design effects, hidden clusters, or the absence of relevant explanatory variables in the model. When there is overdispersion, model selection based on the standard likelihood ratio test, the Akaike information criterion, or the Bayesian information criterion generally would be expected to perform poorly. A very simple adjustment to these model selection criteria, to account for overdispersion, is proposed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
D. FIRTH and J. KUHA
Comments on "A Critique of the Bayesian Information Criterion for Model Selection"
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 1999; 27(3): 398 - 402.
[PDF]