Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KATZ, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ethnography's Warrants

JACK KATZ

University of California, Los Angeles

"Assuming your argument is empirically sound, so what?" Ethnographers are especially vulnerable to this question because their warrants are commonly diffused throughout their texts, because they aim to describe what is obvious to their subjects, and because such rude questions usually are raised only silently. Perhaps the most common warrant for ethnography is a claim that social forces have created a moralized ignorance that separates research subjects and the research audience. The author discusses several dilemmas that plague ethnographers when they attempt to bridge the gap, and then he describes the strategy of naturalistic ethnography. Last, he briefly addresses a broader range of warrants, identifying five additional, frequently used, complementary justifications for ethnographic studies.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 391-423 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124197025004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
A. Deener
Forging Distinct Paths Towards Authentic Identity: Outsider Art, Public Interaction, and Identity Transition in an Informal Market Context
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2009; 38(2): 169 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JournalismHome page
E. Novek
'The devil's bargain': Censorship, identity and the promise of empowerment in a prison newspaper
Journalism, February 1, 2005; 6(1): 5 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
J. Katz
On the Rhetoric and Politics of Ethnographic Methodology
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2004; 595(1): 280 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
K. O. Ferris
Seeing and Being Seen: The Moral Order of Celebrity Sightings
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, June 1, 2004; 33(3): 236 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EthnographyHome page
J. Katz and T. J. Csordas
Phenomenological Ethnography in Sociology and Anthropology
Ethnography, September 1, 2003; 4(3): 275 - 288.
[PDF]


Home page
EthnographyHome page
J. Katz
From How to Why: On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography (Part I)
Ethnography, December 1, 2001; 2(4): 443 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]