Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAYNARD, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by SCHAEFFER, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Keeping the Gate

Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview

DOUGLAS W. MAYNARD

Indiana University

NORA CATE SCHAEFFER

University of Wisconsin-Madison

The authors employ a conversation-analytic perspective, using a haphazard sample of recorded phone calls, to analyze the sequential placement of and turn construction manner for recipients' declinations of the request to participate in a telephone survey interview. Recipients regularly respond very early in the opening of the phone call, just after the "reason for the call" is stated. In constructing their declining turns, recipients are either polite (claiming the "bad timing" of the request or that they are "not interested"), or they are impolite, as when they abruptly hang up. Some declinations are without preamble and are minimalist, whereas others are expressive and contain some question about the nature or length of the interview. The distribution of declination types reflect interviewers' and recipients' coordinated social actions in their brief encounter. The authors explore implications for survey design and data quality.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 34-79 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124197026001002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
A. B. O'Donnell, K. E. Lutfey, L. D. Marceau, and J. B. McKinlay
Using Focus Groups to Improve the Validity of Cross-National Survey Research: A Study of Physician Decision Making
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2007; 17(7): 971 - 981.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
W. van der Vaart, Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra
Do Interviewers' Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2006; 18(4): 488 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
J. Potter
Review EssayStudying the Standardized Survey as Interaction
Qualitative Research, August 1, 2003; 3(2): 269 - 278.
[PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J. PICKERY, G. LOOSVELDT, and A. CARTON
The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2001; 29(4): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. HOUTKOOP-STEENSTRA and H. van den BERGH
Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2000; 28(3): 281 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]