This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WARREN, J. R. Articles by HAUSER, R. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Choosing a Measure of Occupational Standing

How Useful are Composite Measures in Analyses of Gender Inequality in Occupational Attainment?

University of Wisconsin-Madison

JENNIFER T. SHERIDAN

University of Wisconsin-Madison

ROBERT M. HAUSER

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Does the choice of measure of occupational standing affect inferences about gender differences in occupational attainment? The authors use data from the 1994 General Social Survey and the 1986-1988 Survey of Income and Program Participation to analyze the role of gender in the process of occupational attainment 15 times, each time using a different measure of occupational standing. Composite indexes of occupational standing are too heterogeneous to be useful in studies of occupational stratification, especially studies of gender differences. Women often have higher levels of education than men in the same occupation, while the opposite is true for earnings. Thus, using a composite index, the relative standing of men's and women's occupations is an arbitrary function of the weights given to occupational education and earnings. It is preferable to index occupations separately by each of their socioeconomic characteristics, or to use other, more direct measures of occupational characteristics.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Magnusson Gender, Occupational Prestige, and Wages: A Test of Devaluation Theory Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 8, 2008; (2008) jcn035v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]