This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by SOBEL, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Causal Inference in Statistical Models of the Process of Socioeconomic Achievement

A Case Study

University of Arizona

Typically, using data from a nonexperimental study, quantitative sociologists model one or more outcomes as a function of independent variables, interpreting the resulting parameter estimates as effects. This article compares the usual approach to causal inference in sociology with an alternative approach that builds explicitly on a counterfactual account of causation. The comparison is relevant because sociologists typically interpret (incorrectly) parameter estimates obtained using the first approach as supporting causal statements that are counterfactual. To make matters concrete, the author reconsiders an attainment model of Featherman and Hauser, who are interested in comparing the effects of family background on achievement, by sex and time. This analysis suggests the coefficients in the regressions of respondent's education and occupational status on background should not be interpreted as effects. However, because a child's sex is determined without regard for his or her subsequent achievements, sex may be viewed as randomly assigned, justifying treating sex as the cause and the background variables as covariates. Unfortunately, the way in which the data were collected preclude such a treatment.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 318-348 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124198027002006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Morgan Methodologist as Arbitrator: Five Models for Black-White Differences in the Causal Effect of Expectations on Attainment Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2004; 33(1): 3 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. FRANK Impact of a Confounding Variable on a Regression Coefficient Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 2000; 29(2): 147 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]