Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROON, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by HAGENAARS, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Analyzing Change in Categorical Variables by Generalized Log-Linear Models

MARCEL A. CROON

Tilburg University

WICHER BERGSMA

Tilburg University

JACQUES A. HAGENAARS

Tilburg University

This article discusses how several hypotheses about change in discrete variables can be tested on data obtained in a longitudinal study. A first class of hypotheses pertain to the invariance of certain characteristics of marginal distributions. A second class of hypotheses derive from assumptions about the causal relations between the variables. In this article, the authors show how all these hypotheses can be tested by means of a generalization of log-linear modeling developed by Lang and Agresti. By means of the same approach, it is also possible to test conjunctions of several hypotheses from both classes.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 195-229 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124100029002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?