Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER ZOUWEN, J.
Right arrow Articles by VAN TILBURG, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reactivity in Panel Studies and its Consequences for Testing Causal Hypotheses

JOHANNES VAN DER ZOUWEN

Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

THEO VAN TILBURG

Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

The procedure of standardized repeated measurement, as used in panel studies, may hamper the quality of the data, due to the potential "reactivity" of survey interviewing on respondents' attitudes and behavior. In case respondents are interviewed in subsequent waves by different interviewers, differential interviewer effects may occur. These threats to data quality are illustrated with data from a longitudinal study among 2,819 older adults, conducted in the Netherlands. From an analysis of 100 interview protocols, it appears that the behavior of the interviewers has a significant impact on the data obtained. On one hand, interviewers seem to adjust their interviewing strategy to a norm regarding a "normal" personal network and, on the other hand, to a norm about the appropriate interviewing time. Suggestions are formulated to prevent misestimating actual change within respondents over time, leading to incorrect conclusions about causal relationships.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 35-56 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124101030001003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Public Opin QHome page
V. Toepoel, M. Das, and A. Van Soest
Effects of Design in Web Surveys: Comparing Trained and Fresh Respondents
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(5): 985 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J.-P. Schrapler
Respondent Behavior in Panel Studies: A Case Study for Income Nonresponse by Means of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2004; 33(1): 118 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]