Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Case-Deletion Diagnostics for Factor Analysis Models With Continuous and Ordinal Categorical Data

Sik-Yum Lee,

Liang Xu,

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

This article proposes a method to detect influential observations in a factor analysis model with continuous and ordinal categorical variables. The key ideas are to treat the latent factors as hypothetical missing data and then develop the diagnostic measures on the basis of the conditional expectation of the complete-data log-likelihood function in the EM algorithm. A one-step approximation is proposed to reduce the computational burden. Building blocks for achieving the diagnostic measures are computed via observations generated by the Gibbs sampler. Results from a simulation study and an illustrative real example are presented.

Key Words: influential observations • EM algorithm • Gibbs sampler • one-step approximation

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 389-419 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124102239081


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?