This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Diprete, T. A. Articles by Engelhardt, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Estimating Causal Effects With Matching Methods in the Presence and Absence of Bias Cancellation

Duke University

Henriette Engelhardt

Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna

This article explores the implications of bias cancellation on the estimate of average treatment effects using ordinary least squares (OLS) and Rubin-style matching methods. Bias cancellation (offsetting biases at high and low propensities for treatment in estimates of treatment effects that are uncorrected for nonrandom selection) has been observed when job training is the treatment variable and earnings is the outcome variable. Contrary to published assertions in the literature, bias cancellation is not explainable in terms of the standard selection model, which assumes a symmetric distribution for the errors in the structural and assignment equations. A substantive rationale for bias cancellation is offered, which conceptualizes bias cancellation as the result of a mixture process based on two distinct individual-level decision-making models. While the general properties are unknown, the existence of bias cancellation appears to reduce the average bias in both OLS and matching methods relative to the symmetric distribution case.

Key Words: causal effects • treatment effect • matching methods • bias cancellation

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, 501-528 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124103260187


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Gerber and N. Malhotra Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results? Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2008; 37(1): 3 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Morgan and D. J. Harding Matching Estimators of Causal Effects: Prospects and Pitfalls in Theory and Practice Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2006; 35(1): 3 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]