Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacy, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Explained Variation Measure for Ordinal Response Models With Comparisons to Other Ordinal R² Measures

Michael G. Lacy

Colorado State University

No explained variation (R2) measure for ordinal response models enjoys wide use, and such measures have in fact received little specific attention or evaluation. To remedy this gap, the author presents and justifies R2O, an explained variation measure for ordinal response models, which is based on a recent ordinal dispersion measure. The use and function of R2O is illustrated, and the performance of it and other ordinal R2 measures is compared via a series of simulated sampling and variable selection experiments. The R2O and a bias-adjusted version of it perform well in the simulation experiments and have a number of other advantages that make them attractive as measures of fit for any ordinal response model.

Key Words: ordinal response models • variation measure • R2O • R2 measures

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 469-520 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124106286329


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?