Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, S.
Right arrow Articles by Long, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing for IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model

Simon Cheng

University of Connecticut, Storrs, simon.cheng{at}uconn.edu

J. Scott Long

Indiana University, Bloomington

The multinomial logit model is perhaps the most commonly used regression model for nominal outcomes in the social sciences. A concern raised by many researchers, however, is the assumption of the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) that is implicit in the model. In this article, the authors undertake a series of Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the three most commonly discussed tests of IIA. Results suggest that the size properties of the most common IIA tests depend on the data structure for the independent variables. These findings are consistent with an earlier impression that, even in well-specified models, IIA tests often reject the assumption when the alternatives seem distinct and often fail to reject IIA when the alternatives can reasonably be viewed as close substitutes. The authors conclude that tests of the IIA assumption that are based on the estimation of a restricted choice set are unsatisfactory for applied work.

Key Words: IIA • independent of irrelevant alternatives • multinominal logit

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, 583-600 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124106292361
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Management ScienceHome page
D. Hegde, D. C. Mowery, and S. J. H. Graham
Pioneering Inventors or Thicket Builders: Which U.S. Firms Use Continuations in Patenting?
Management Science, July 1, 2009; 55(7): 1214 - 1226.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
H. Nixon, J.-D. M. Saphores, O. A. Ogunseitan, and A. A. Shapiro
Understanding Preferences for Recycling Electronic Waste in California: The Influence of Environmental Attitudes and Beliefs on Willingness to Pay
Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 41(1): 101 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
M. N. Green and D. B. Harris
Goal Salience and the 2006 Race for House Majority Leader
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2007; 60(4): 618 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]