This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bielby, W. T. Articles by Hauser, R. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Response Error in Earnings Functions for Nonblack Males

University of California-Santa Barbara

Robert M. Hauser

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Biases due to measurement errors in an earnings function for nonblack males are assessed by estimating unobserved variable models with data from the Income Supplement Reinterview program of the March 1973 Current Population Survey and from the remeasurement program of the 1973 Occupational Changes in a Generation-II survey. We find that reports of social origins, educational and occupational attainments, labor supply, and earnings of nonblack males are subject to primarily random response errors. Logarithmic earnings is one of the most accurately measured indicators of socioeconomic success. Further, retrospective reports of status variables are as reliable as contemporaneous reports. When measurement errors are ignored for nonblacks, the total economic return to schooling is underestimated by about 16% and the effects of some background variables are underestimated by as much as 15%. The total effects offirst and current job status are underestimated by about 20% when measurement errors are ignored, as are the unmediated effects of current job status. Conflicting evidence is presented on whether respondents tend to understate the consistency between their earnings and educational attainments in the Current Population Survey. If there is such a tendency, unmediated effects of education are modestly understated when response errors are ignored, and they are overstated if no such tendency exists.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 241-280 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/004912417700600207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. F. ALWIN Research on Survey Quality Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1991; 20(1): 3 - 29. [Abstract]

				L. M. Wolfle and C. A. Ethington Within-Variable, between Occasion Error Covariances in Models of Educational Achievement Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1986; 46(3): 571 - 583. [Abstract]