Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sociological Methods & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluating Race-of-Interviewer Effects In a National Survey

Nora Cate Schaeffer

National Opinion Research Center University of Chicago

The present article attempts to overcome some of the problems involved in estimating race-of-interviewer effects in a nonexperimental national survey. Individual items as well as scales were examined, using General Social Survey (GSS) data. Race-of-interviewer effects large enough to justify the practice of matching interviewer and respondent race for interviews on racial topics were found for both black and white respondents. A few such effects were found for nonracial items among blacks, but the range of items involved is smaller than what has been reported in previous studies. The impact of race-of-interviewer effects on mean estimates in the GSS appears to be small for white respondents, due to the small proportion of cross-race interviews. The proportion of cross-race interviews among blacks is larger and more variable over the years, and the impact of race-of-interviewer effects should be considered when analyzing items which show these effects.

Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 400-419 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/004912418000800403
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
R. E. Davis, M. P. Couper, N. K. Janz, C. H. Caldwell, and K. Resnicow
Interviewer effects in public health surveys
Health Educ. Res., September 17, 2009; (2009) cyp046v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Rahman, L. Gibney, S. D. Person, O. D. Williams, C. Kiefe, P. Jolly, and J. Roseman
Validity of Self-Reports of Reasons for Hospitalization by Young Adults and Risk Factors for Discordance with Medical Records: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2005; 162(5): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
P. E. CONVERSE and M. W. TRAUGOTT
Assessing the Accuracy of Polls and Surveys
Science, November 28, 1986; 234(4780): 1094 - 1098.
[Abstract] [PDF]