Sociological Methods & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wejnert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Heckathorn, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on August 1, 2008
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 105-134 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0049124108318333

Web-Based Network Sampling

Efficiency and Efficacy of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Online Research

Cyprian Wejnert

Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, cw79{at}cornell.edu

Douglas D. Heckathorn

Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

This study tests the feasibility, effectiveness, and efficiency of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) as a Web-based sampling method. Web-based RDS (WebRDS) is found to be highly efficient and effective. The online nature of WebRDS allows referral chains to progress very quickly, such that studies with large samples can be expected to proceed up to 20 times faster than with traditional sampling methods. Additionally, the unhidden nature of the study population allows comparison of RDS estimators to institutional data. Results indicate that RDS estimates are reasonable but not precise. This is likely due to bias associated with the random recruitment assumption and small sample size of the study. Finally, this article presents methods for testing the validity of assumptions required by RDS estimation.

Key Words: respondent-driven sampling • online research • network sampling • higher education

References

  • Abdul-Quader, Abu S., Douglas D. Heckathorn, Courtney McKnight, Heidi Bramson, Chris Nemeth, Keith Sabin, Kathleen Gallagher, and Don C. Des Jarlais. 2006. ``Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Recruiting Drug Users in New York City: Findings From a Pilot Study.'' Journal of Urban Health 83:459-76.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bell, David C., Benedetta Belli-McQueen, and Ali Haider. 2007. ``Partner Naming and Forgetting: Recall of Network Members.'' Social Networks 29:279-99.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Berg, S. 1988. ``Snowball Sampling.'' Pp. 528-32 in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. 8, edited by S. Kotz and N. I. Johnson. New York: John Wiley.
  • Bollobas, Béla. 1985. Random Graphs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brewer, K.R.W. and Muhammad Hanif. 1983. Sampling With Unequal Probability. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cochran, William G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. 3d ed. New York: John Wiley.
  • Coleman, James S. 1958. ``Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organization With Survey Methods.'' Human Organization 17:28-36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cornell University. 2004. ``Enrollment at a Glance.'' Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Division of Planning and Budget. Retrieved May 5, 2004, from http://dpb.cornell.edu/F_Undergraduate_Enrollment.htm
  • Heckathorn, Douglas D. 1997. ``Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations.'' Social Problems 44:174-99.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • ---. 2002. ``Respondent-Driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Population Estimates From Chain Referral Samples of Hidden Populations. '' Social Problems 49:11-34.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • ---. 2007. ``Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Analyzing Continuous Variables and Controlling for Differential Recruitment. '' Sociological Methodology 37:151-207.[CrossRef]
  • Heckathorn, Douglas D. and Joan Jeffri. 2001. ``Finding the Beat: Using Respondent-Driven Sampling to Study Jazz Musicians.'' Poetics 28:307-29.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • ---. 2003. ``Networks of Jazz Musicians.'' Pp. 48-61 in Changing the Beat: A Study of the Worklife of Jazz Musicians, vol. III, Respondent-Driven Sampling: Survey Results by the Research Center for Arts and Culture. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts Research Division Report 43.
  • Heckathorn, Douglas D., Robert S. Broadhead, Denise L. Anthony, and David L. Weakliem. 1999. ``AIDS and Social Networks: Prevention Through Network Mobilization.'' Sociological Focus 32:159-79.
  • Heckathorn, Douglas D. and Robert Magnani. Forthcoming. ``Snowball and Respondent-Driven Sampling.'' In Behavioral Surveillance Surveys: Guidelines for Repeated Behavioral Surveys in Populations at Risk for HIV. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
  • Heckathorn, Douglas D., Salaam Semaan, Robert S. Broadhead, and James J. Hughes. 2002. ``Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18-25.'' AIDS and Behavior 6:55-67.[CrossRef]
  • Heimer, Robert. 2005. ``Critical Issues and Further Questions About Respondent-Driven Sampling: Comment on Ramirez-Valles et al. (2005).'' AIDS and Behavior 9:403-408.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ibarra, Herminia. 1993. ``Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework.'' Academy of Management Review 18:56-87.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Johnston, Lisa, Keith Sabin, Mai Thu Hien, and Pham Thi Huong. 2006. ``Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit Female Sex Workers in Two Cities in Vietnam.'' Journal of Urban Health 83:i16-i28.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Marsden, Peter V. 1990. ``Network Data and Measurement.'' Annual Review of Sociology 16:435-63.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • McCarty, Christopher, Peter D. Killworth, H. Russell Bernard, Eugene C. Johnsen, and Gene A. Shelley. 2001. ``Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size.'' Human Organization 60:28-39.[ISI]
  • Ramirez-Valles, Jesus, Douglas D. Heckathorn, Raquel Vázquez, Rafael M. Diaz, and Richard T. Campbell. 2005a. ``From Networks to Populations: The Development and Application of Respondent-Driven Sampling Among IDUs and Latino Gay Men.'' AIDS and Behavior 9:387-402.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • ---. 2005b. ``The Fit Between Theory and Data in Respondent-Driven Sampling: Response to Heimer.'' AIDS and Behavior 9:409-14.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Salganik, Mathew J. 2006. ``Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven Sampling.'' Journal of Urban Health 83:i98-i112.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Salganik, Mathew J. and Douglas D. Heckathorn. 2004. ``Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling.'' Sociological Methodology 34:193-239.[CrossRef]
  • Semaan, Salaam, Jennifer Lauby, and Jon Liebman. 2002. ``Street and Network Sampling in Evaluation Studies of HIV Risk-Reduction Interventions. '' AIDS Review 4:213-23.
  • Stueve, Ann, Lydia N. O'Donnell, Richard Duran, Alexi San Doval, and Julianna Blorne. 2001. ``Time-Space Sampling in Minority Communities: Results With Young Latino Men Who Have Sex With Men.'' American Journal of Public Health 91:922-26.[Abstract]
  • Sudman, Seymour. 1980. ``Improving the Quality of Shopping Center Sampling. '' Journal of Marketing Research 17:423-31.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Sudman, Seymour and Graham Kalton. 1986. ``New Developments in the Sampling of Special Populations.'' Annual Review of Sociology 12:401-29.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Sudman, Seymour, Monroe G. Sirken, and Charles D. Cowan. 1988. ``Sampling Rare and Elusive Populations.'' Science 240:991-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Van Emmerick, I. J. Hetty. 2006. ``Gender Differences in the Creation of Different Types of Social Capital: A Multilevel Study.'' Social Networks 28:24-37.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Volz, Erik and Douglas D. Heckathorn. Forthcoming. ``Probability-Based Estimation Theory for Respondent-Driven Sampling.'' Journal of Official Statistics.
  • Wang, Jichuan, Robert G. Carlson, Russel S. Falck, Harvey A. Siegal, Ahmmed Rahman, and Linna Li. 2005. ``Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit MDMA Users: A Methodological Assessment.'' Drug and Alcohol Dependence 78:147-57.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Watts, Duncan J. and Steven H. Strogatz. 1998. ``Collective Dynamics of `Small-World' Networks.'' Nature 393:440-42.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wejnert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Heckathorn, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?