<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com">
<title>Sociology current issue</title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Sociology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>October 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Sociology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0038-0385</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/821?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/837?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/857?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/873?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/905?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/919?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/953?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/971?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/987?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/1003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1023?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1034?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1036?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1037?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://soc.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Sociology</title>
<url>http://soc.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/813?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial Foreword: The Future of the Research Relationship]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/813?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crow, G., Pope, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094594</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial Foreword: The Future of the Research Relationship]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>819</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>813</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/821?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Repositioning Documents in Social Research]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/821?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In matters of social research sociologists and other social scientists have tended to view documents primarily as sources of evidence and as receptacles of inert content.The key strategies for data exploration have consequently been associated with various styles of content or thematic analysis. Even when discourse analysis has been recommended, there has been a marked tendency to deal with records, files, and the like, primarily as containers &mdash; things to be read, understood, and categorized. In this article, however, the author seeks to demonstrate that by focussing on the functioning of documents instead of content, sociology can embrace a much wider range of approaches to both data collection and analysis. Indeed, the adoption of such a programme encourages researchers to see documents as active agents in the world, and to view documentation as a key component of dynamic networks rather than as a set of static and immutable `things'.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prior, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094564</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Repositioning Documents in Social Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>836</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>821</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/837?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/837?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The rise of digital technologies has the potential to open new directions in ethnography. Despite the ubiquity of these technologies, their infiltration into popular sociological research methods is still limited compared to the insatiable uptake of online scholarly research portals. This article argues that social researchers cannot afford to continue this trend. Building upon pioneering work in `digital ethnography', I critically examine the possibilities and problems of four new technologies &mdash; online questionnaires, digital video, social networking websites, and blogs &mdash; and their potential impacts on the research relationship. The article concludes that a balanced combination of physical and digital ethnography not only gives researchers a larger and more exciting array of methods, but also enables them to demarginalize the voice of respondents. However, access to these technologies remains stratified by class, race, and gender of both researchers and respondents.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murthy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094565</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>855</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>837</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/857?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital Photography and Research Relationships: Capturing the Fashion Moment]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/857?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article focuses on the interactions produced by the use of the digital camera in a mass observation into everyday fashions in Nottingham. The research project includes a team of researchers, and so there is no single research relationship. Therefore this article uses the mass observation, which includes photographs and interviews with in excess of 800 participants, to highlight the complexities of the research relationship. The definition of this relationship is widened out to include the interactions between researcher and participant, the relationship participants have to each other, and the relationship they have to themselves.The digital camera is seen as a site of negotiation between researchers and participants; in turn, the research relationship is redefined as a web of interactions which are mediated by the camera and the photographic images.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woodward, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094566</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital Photography and Research Relationships: Capturing the Fashion Moment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>872</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>857</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/873?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/873?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For years, sociologists working in other countries or UK-based medical sociologists                 have complained about the effects of having to seek approval from a research ethics                 committee (REC) or its equivalent before starting work. With the arrival of the                 ESRC's Research Ethics Framework, concern about ethics review has expanded to                 sociologists working on a wider range of topics. This article uses ethnographic data                 from a study of UK RECs to examine how these bodies assess applications from social                 scientists, particularly those proposing qualitative research (which opponents claim                 is given an especially hard time by such committees). These data challenge the idea                 that RECs are somehow ideologically biased against qualitative research and that                 they cannot give an adequate assessment of applications from sociologists and other                 social scientists. The article concludes by suggesting sociologists' time would be                 better spent studying the institutional nature of the university RECs stimulated by                 the ESRC.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hedgecoe, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094567</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>886</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>873</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethical and Political Issues in Contemporary Research Relationships]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article discusses how ethical and political issues affect contemporary research relationships. It focuses on the responsibilities of researchers studying organizations and elites, and the discussion draws upon the author's experience of researching NHS primary health care services. The article reviews the spread of `ethical guidelines' from medical to social research. Such guidelines primarily address ethical problems relating to individual researcher&mdash;researched relationships. Sociologists have criticized the application of medically based guidelines to social research, while often accepting an ethical framework based on the researcher&mdash;researched dyad. But this limited conception of ethical responsibilities leaves complex organizational power hierarchies and their effects undertheorized. Researchers may then be vulnerable and lack guidance where organizational loyalties and market mechanisms have undermined the traditional supports of academic independence and professionalism. Sociologists could learn from critical medical scientists' responses to some related ethical dilemmas, as some medical researchers have experienced these issues more acutely and for longer.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aldred, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethical and Political Issues in Contemporary Research Relationships]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>903</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/905?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing `Situated Ethics' in the Field]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/905?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article discusses the covert research relationship. Specifically, it explores the ethical dimensions of fieldwork with reference to a six-month covert ethnography of `bouncers', in Manchester. Drawing from sociological literatures, the article wishes to raise for scrutiny the management of situated ethics in covert fieldwork which, despite having some increased recognition via debates about risk and danger in fieldwork, remains glossed over. The standard discourse on ethics is abstracted from the actual doing, which is a mediated and contingent set of practices. Traditionally, professional ethics has been centralized around the doctrine of informed consent with covert methodology being frowned upon and effectively marginalized as a type of `last resort methodology'.What I highlight here is the case for covert research in the face of much conventional opposition. I hope the article will open debate and dialogue about its potential role and possible creative future in the social science community.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvey, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing `Situated Ethics' in the Field]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>918</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>905</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/919?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Price Worth Paying?: Considering the `Cost' of Reflexive Research Methods and the Influence of Feminist Ways of `Doing']]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/919?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on analysis of relevant literature, focus groups, and web-based discussion board postings, assembled as part of an inquiry into risks to the well-being of qualitative researchers, it is argued that emotional harm is more prevalent than physical harm and may be particularly associated with reflexivity and the important influence of feminist research methods. The particular concern of feminist researchers with reflexivity, with research relationships and with the interests of research participants may make them especially vulnerable to emotional harm.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sampson, H., Bloor, M., Fincham, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094570</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Price Worth Paying?: Considering the `Cost' of Reflexive Research Methods and the Influence of Feminist Ways of `Doing']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>933</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>919</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/935?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Putting Emotion and Reflexivity to Work in Researching Migration]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/935?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent debates within sociology and feminist theory have identified a need for reflexive research and noted the importance of emotion in the researcher's relationship to the object of research and the research process.This article contributes to these debates by arguing that emotionally mediated apprehensions of the object of study and the practice of critical reflexivity in sociological research cannot be separated. This is because emotional identifications and attachments are central to the (re)framing of the object of study and the politics of knowledge production. Thus, attempts to find more reliable grounds for knowledge claims must be located in the interrelated landscapes of feeling, intellect and politics.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094571</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Putting Emotion and Reflexivity to Work in Researching Migration]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>952</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>935</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/953?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[`We're Over-Researched Here!': Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/953?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite a number of references to research fatigue and over-researching in the literature, the concepts have yet to be empirically investigated within qualitative contexts. This article, therefore, seeks to explore how researchers understand and account for research fatigue and over-researching. Using the results generated from a grounded analysis, a number of precursors are identified and discussed. These include lack of perceptible change attributable to engagement, increasing apathy and indifference toward engagement, and practical causes such as cost, time, and organization. It is suggested that marked levels of research fatigue are likely to occur where the mechanisms that challenge research engagement increase and the supporting mechanisms decrease. Furthermore, claims of over-researching are likely to be reported in contexts where repeated engagements do not lead to any experience of change or where the engagement comes into conflict with the primary aims and interests of the research group.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094573</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[`We're Over-Researched Here!': Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>970</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>953</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/971?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[`Knowledge Once Divided Can Be Hard to Put Together Again': An Epistemological Critique of Collaborative and Team-Based Research Practices]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/971?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an `academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while <I>theoretically</I> qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research <I>practices</I> embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge `in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge `in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research <I>practices</I> that rely on concerted team-based <I>relations</I> rather than <I>divisions</I> of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauthner, N. S., Doucet, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094574</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[`Knowledge Once Divided Can Be Hard to Put Together Again': An Epistemological Critique of Collaborative and Team-Based Research Practices]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>985</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>971</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/987?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acquiring a Sociological Identity: An Observational Study of a PhD Project]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/987?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The acquisition of a sociological identity during the process of PhD supervision is reported, drawing on detailed analysis of selected observations of the supervision sessions, written communications and other aspects of interaction over the period of a single case study supervision which involved the authors as participants. The transition from an `applied' identity (in nursing) to a `pure' or `professional' identity in sociology is documented, identifying the precise interactional mechanisms for encouraging and achieving this transition. These include `bracketing' out of common-sense interpretations of behaviour that draw on the old identity and `distancing' from the normative judgements of professionals inhabiting a dispreferred, non-sociological position. Taking place in a context of enthusiastic, directive and insistent exhortation and presenting a particular and somewhat locally determined version of adequate sociological work, the study shows both supervisor and student collaborating in the social construction of a sociologist.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, S., Seale, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094575</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acquiring a Sociological Identity: An Observational Study of a PhD Project]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1002</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>987</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/1003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does British Sociology Count?: Sociology Students' Attitudes toward Quantitative Methods]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/5/1003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The research reported here is from the first national survey of British undergraduate attitudes to the methodological character of the discipline and specifically to quantitative methods.The study found that most sociology students saw their subject as closer to the humanities than the sciences. However, whilst as anticipated many students expressed anxiety about quantitative methods and `number', a slight majority nevertheless expressed no such anxiety. The methodological issue for sociology is perhaps less to do with a numeric deficit and more to do with a lack of student interest in the use of quantitative methods. It may be concluded that the views held by present undergraduates do not augur well for a methodologically pluralist discipline in the future, or more generally for key numeric and analytic skills sociology graduates can bring to other professions and occupations.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, M., Payne, G., Hodgkinson, L., Poade, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does British Sociology Count?: Sociology Students' Attitudes toward Quantitative Methods]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1021</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1023?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Orchestra of Soloists?: P. Drew, G. Raymond and D.Weinburg (eds). Talk and Interaction in Social                 Research Methods. London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}60 hbk, {pound}21.99 pbk                 (ISBN: 0 7619 5705 7), xi+248 pp; K. Charmez. Constructing Grounded Theory. London:                 SAGE, 2006, {pound}65 hbk, {pound}20.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 7619 7353 2), xiv+208                 pp. A. Alaszewski. Using Diaries for Social Research: A Practical Guide London: SAGE,                 2006, {pound}20.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 7619 7291 9), viii+136 pp; R. Sapsford and V.                 Jupp (eds). Data Collection and Analysis, 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}70                 hbk, {pound}24.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 335 21600 5), xii+300 pp; R.Tarling. Managing                 Social Research: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge, 2006, $125 hbk, $42.99 pbk                 (ISBN: 0 415 35517 6), xii+180 pp; N. Gilbert and K.G.Troitzsch. Simulation for the                 Social Scientist, 2nd edn Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005, {pound}62                 hbk, {pound}23.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 335 21600 5), xii+300 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1023?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Orchestra of Soloists?: P. Drew, G. Raymond and D.Weinburg (eds). Talk and Interaction in Social                 Research Methods. London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}60 hbk, {pound}21.99 pbk                 (ISBN: 0 7619 5705 7), xi+248 pp; K. Charmez. Constructing Grounded Theory. London:                 SAGE, 2006, {pound}65 hbk, {pound}20.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 7619 7353 2), xiv+208                 pp. A. Alaszewski. Using Diaries for Social Research: A Practical Guide London: SAGE,                 2006, {pound}20.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 7619 7291 9), viii+136 pp; R. Sapsford and V.                 Jupp (eds). Data Collection and Analysis, 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}70                 hbk, {pound}24.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 335 21600 5), xii+300 pp; R.Tarling. Managing                 Social Research: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge, 2006, $125 hbk, $42.99 pbk                 (ISBN: 0 415 35517 6), xii+180 pp; N. Gilbert and K.G.Troitzsch. Simulation for the                 Social Scientist, 2nd edn Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005, {pound}62                 hbk, {pound}23.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 335 21600 5), xii+300 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1028</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1023</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: D. Oesch. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and         Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave         Macmillan, 2006, {pound}60 hbk, no price stated pbk (ISBN: 1 4039 8591 X),         xiv+257 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addison, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0038038508094578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: D. Oesch. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and         Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave         Macmillan, 2006, {pound}60 hbk, no price stated pbk (ISBN: 1 4039 8591 X),         xiv+257 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1031</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Keith F. Punch. Developing Effective Research Proposals, 2nd edn.         London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 1 4129 2126 0), ix+164 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/00380385080420051402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Keith F. Punch. Developing Effective Research Proposals, 2nd edn.         London: SAGE, 2006, {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 1 4129 2126 0), ix+164 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1032</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mark Petticrew and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the         Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, {pound}29.99 hbk         (ISBN: 1 4051 2110 6), xii+336 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auger, J.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/00380385080420051403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mark Petticrew and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the         Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, {pound}29.99 hbk         (ISBN: 1 4051 2110 6), xii+336 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1034?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Renata Phelps, Kath Fisher and Allan Ellis. Organizing and         Managing Your Research: A Practical Guide for Postgraduates. London: SAGE, 2007,         {pound}60.00 hbk, {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 1 4129 2064 3), xiii+304 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1034?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gruszczynska, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/00380385080420051404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Renata Phelps, Kath Fisher and Allan Ellis. Organizing and         Managing Your Research: A Practical Guide for Postgraduates. London: SAGE, 2007,         {pound}60.00 hbk, {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 1 4129 2064 3), xiii+304 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1035</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1034</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1036?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Les Back. The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg, 2007,         {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 9 7818 4520 1210), 256 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1036?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanson, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/00380385080420051405</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Les Back. The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg, 2007,         {pound}19.99 pbk (ISBN: 9 7818 4520 1210), 256 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1037</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1036</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Libby Schweber. Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital         Statistics in France and England, 1830--1885. Durham, NC: Duke University         Press, 2006, {pound}14.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 8223 3814 9), x+278 pp]]></title>
<link>http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/5/1037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanderstraeten, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/00380385080420051406</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Libby Schweber. Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital         Statistics in France and England, 1830--1885. Durham, NC: Duke University         Press, 2006, {pound}14.99 pbk (ISBN: 0 8223 3814 9), x+278 pp]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Sociological Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1039</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>